Rayn v. Besneatte CA1/1
Defendant Dane Besneatte appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him. On appeal, he argues that (1) the denial of the motion was improper and (2) the default judgment wrongly awarded punitive damages to plaintiff Rhonda Rayn. We disagree with the first claim and lack jurisdiction to consider the second. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Rayn v. Besneatte CA1/1