Sawh v. Sawh CA4/1
Appellant Lalit Chandh Sawh (Lee) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Chinta Mani Sawh (Mani) following a bench trial on Mani's action for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract as well as the cross-complaints of Lee and LSMS Investments (LSMS) seeking an accounting. The actions arose from the two brothers' oral agreement to develop a commercial property.
Lee contends insufficient evidence supports the trial court's findings that (1) in his capacity as successor in interest to LMK Investments (LMK), he owed $119,336 in damages to cross-complainant LSMS; (2) he owed Mani $319,509 based on the brothers' oral agreement to "true-up" or settle accounts; and (3) he owed Mani $233,477 in accrued interest. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the court's findings and accordingly affirm.
Comments on Sawh v. Sawh CA4/1