legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sawh v. Sawh CA4/1
Appellant Lalit Chandh Sawh (Lee) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Chinta Mani Sawh (Mani) following a bench trial on Mani's action for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract as well as the cross-complaints of Lee and LSMS Investments (LSMS) seeking an accounting. The actions arose from the two brothers' oral agreement to develop a commercial property.
Lee contends insufficient evidence supports the trial court's findings that (1) in his capacity as successor in interest to LMK Investments (LMK), he owed $119,336 in damages to cross-complainant LSMS; (2) he owed Mani $319,509 based on the brothers' oral agreement to "true-up" or settle accounts; and (3) he owed Mani $233,477 in accrued interest. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the court's findings and accordingly affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale