Worman v. Investment Co. of Santa Monica
Appellants Investment Co. of Santa Monica (ICSM), Pacific Systems, Thompson Industrial Properties (collectively, the Companies), and Robert Thompson (Thompson) appeal from a postjudgment order requiring them to produce to respondent Pamela Worman, also known as Pamela Wells (Worman), attorney billing invoices and other financial documents disclosing the Companies’ litigation expenses in certain pending and active legal matters. We reverse the order because it requires appellants to disclose information protected by the attorney-client privilege and contravenes the California Supreme Court’s holding in Los Angeles County Bd. of Supervisors v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.5th 282 (Board of Supervisors).
Comments on Worman v. Investment Co. of Santa Monica