P. v. Chastang CA4/1
Christopher Mark Chastang appeals from a postjudgment order revoking his probation and sentencing him to two years in prison. He contends we must reverse the order because the court erred by failing to obtain and consider a supplemental probation report before revoking his probation. We conclude any error was harmless under the circumstances of this case. We, therefore, affirm the order.
Comments on P. v. Chastang CA4/1