legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.H. CA2/8
The juvenile court terminated dependency jurisdiction and issued an order granting sole physical and legal custody of I.H. to father I.H., Sr., and mother D.T. was given monitored visits. Mother does not claim any error in the termination of the juvenile court’s dependency jurisdiction, nor did she object to the custody orders in the trial court. Her sole claim on appeal regards the juvenile court’s visitation order.
She argues that the juvenile court delegated to father the power to prevent mother’s visitation, as the monitor must be approved by father or paid for by her. Since mother expressly agreed to the custody and visitation orders, she forfeited appellate review of the visitation order. Thus, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale