In re I.H. CA2/8
The juvenile court terminated dependency jurisdiction and issued an order granting sole physical and legal custody of I.H. to father I.H., Sr., and mother D.T. was given monitored visits. Mother does not claim any error in the termination of the juvenile court’s dependency jurisdiction, nor did she object to the custody orders in the trial court. Her sole claim on appeal regards the juvenile court’s visitation order.
She argues that the juvenile court delegated to father the power to prevent mother’s visitation, as the monitor must be approved by father or paid for by her. Since mother expressly agreed to the custody and visitation orders, she forfeited appellate review of the visitation order. Thus, we affirm.
Comments on In re I.H. CA2/8