In re G.M. CA6
In this juvenile dependency matter regarding Ga. M. (the child), the juvenile court terminated parental rights and selected adoption as the permanent plan pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. On appeal, Ge. M. (the father) contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by terminating his parental rights after determining that the beneficial parent/child relationship exception did not apply. (See § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) We will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re G.M. CA6