PEOPLE v. MATYE
Evidence was sufficient to support finding that 60-year-old victim was a dependent adult for purposes of Penal Code Sec. 368(b)(1) and (f) where, though she could carry out normal activities, her ability to do so was restricted, as she could walk only with a leg brace and cane, and had difficulty speaking, comprehending, and recalling.

Comments on PEOPLE v. MATYE

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced