legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Smith v. Dept. of Social Services CA3
Plaintiffs Millie Smith, John Smith and Gilcrest Care Home (collectively, the Smiths) appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the Department of Social Services’ (DSS) motion for summary judgment on the Smiths’ first amended complaint. They also challenge an earlier ruling granting DSS’s motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend on the basis of res judicata. We conclude the allegations in the original complaint were barred by res judicata, and the Smiths have waived any claim of error with respect to the entry of judgment as to the amended complaint. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale