In re M.G
Don E. (father), the presumed father of M.G. (the minor) (born in April 2016), appeals the juvenile court’s jurisdictional/dispositional order that changed father’s visitation from unmonitored to monitored.
Father contends his due process rights were violated when the juvenile court refused to allow him to testify about visitation before it changed his visits from unmonitored to monitored, and he further argues that the error was prejudicial.
Comments on In re M.G