In re A.F. CA2/4
After the juvenile court found that appellant A.F. committed a lewd act upon his four-year-old niece A.G., it issued a protective order. Appellant challenges the protective order, contending that its duration exceeds the statutorily permitted maximum length, and that it contains a defective provision. We agree with those contentions, reverse those portions of the protective order, and direct the juvenile court to modify the order. We otherwise affirm the orders of the juvenile court.
Comments on In re A.F. CA2/4