P. v. DiMarino CA1/4
David DiMarino was convicted of committing lewd and lascivious acts with a minor in violation of Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a), sentenced to prison, and eventually released on parole subject to his agreement not to, among other things, “date, socialize, or form a romantic interest or sexual relationship with any person who has physical custody of a minor.” In these consolidated appeals from two orders revoking his parole based on repeated parole violations, DiMarino argues he was found to have violated unconstitutionally vague and overboard conditions of parole. In one of the appeals, he also claims that his due process rights were violated because his parole officer did not consider lesser sanctions first, before parole revocation proceedings were instituted.
Comments on P. v. DiMarino CA1/4