Washington v. Rite Aid CA5
Appellant Anthonia Washington filed this appeal after both the Labor Commissioner’s office and the Fresno Superior Court separately denied her claim for damages under the Labor Code resulting from her termination by respondent, Rite Aid. Appellant filed an initial appeal after the Labor Commissioner’s office denied her claim, resulting in a de novo trial at the Fresno Superior Court. Appellant now claims the trial court improperly denied her request for a discovery extension and asks this court to grant the extension and “reset the trial date.” For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgement against appellant.
Comments on Washington v. Rite Aid CA5