Ottosi v. Berry et al.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's order granting a special motion to strike (anti-SLAPP motion), brought by defendants against plaintiff's cause of action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the anti-SLAPP motion because the motion was untimely; that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing plaintiff to join in the anti-SLAPP motion; that plaintiff made the submission necessary for showing a reasonable probability of prevailing on his malicious prosecution claim; and that the trial court's evidentiary rulings were incorrect.
Court affirms the trial court's order granting defendants' special motion to strike under section 425.16.
Comments on Ottosi v. Berry et al.