legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.L. CA5
A.H. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders summarily denying her modification petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388, subd. (a)(1)) and terminating her parental rights as to her now 10-year-old daughter, M.L., at a contested section 366.26 hearing. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding her petition failed to make a prima facie showing that returning M.L. to her custody under family maintenance would serve M.L.’s best interest. She further contends the juvenile court erred in not finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship and sibling relationship exceptions to adoption (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i) & (B)(v)) barred termination of her parental rights. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale