legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.P. CA2/2
M.G. (mother) appeals the juvenile court’s orders exerting dependency jurisdiction over her one-year-old daughter M.P. and removing M.P. from her custody. We conclude that substantial evidence supports both orders, and that mother’s challenge to the removal order is also moot because the juvenile court subsequently returned M.P. to her custody. Accordingly, we affirm.
Filed 7/26/17 In re M.P. CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO


In re M.P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. B279395

(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. DK20056)

LOS

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale