P. v. Rodriguez CA1/1
Defendant Santino Rodriguez pleaded no contest to possessing a large-capacity magazine, a felony, and the trial court placed him on probation for three years. On appeal, he contends that four of his probation conditions that involve his use of electronic devices are unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent), unconstitutionally overbroad, and, in one instance, unconstitutionally vague. He also contends that the order granting probation must be modified to reflect the trial court’s promise that he could seek to reduce his offense to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b)(3) (section 17(b)(3)) after successfully completing two years of probation.
Comments on P. v. Rodriguez CA1/1