BORDER BUSINESS PARK, INC v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO Part III
Inverse condemnation claim, based on allegations that city substantially impaired access to plaintiff's business property by diverting truck traffic in such a way that the traffic backed up on the streets adjacent to the business, making ingress and egress to the property "difficult or impossible" and "severely and substantially affect[ing] the marketability of the [property] to prospective tenants," failed as a matter of law where there was no evidence supporting plaintiff's contention that there was gridlock that prevented all access to the business.
Comments on BORDER BUSINESS PARK, INC v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO Part III