legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Rosenberg v. M&T Bank CA1/4
This is the third appeal by appellant Jordan Rosenberg (Rosenberg) challenging adverse trial court rulings dismissing his actions brought for lack of personal jurisdiction against the defendants/respondents in those respective actions. In his first appeal (Rosenberg v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (Feb. 6, 2013, A133504) [nonpub. opn.], we affirmed the trial court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction over Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (Springpoint) and Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (Hudson), the latter being the parent company of respondent M&T Bank (formerly known as Hudson City Savings Bank) (referred to in this opinion as “M&T”). In the second appeal (Rosenberg v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (Oct. 16, 2015, A142709 [nonpub. opn.]), we again affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the same action (Super. Ct. S.F. City and County, 2014, No. CGC-10-505893) for lack of jurisdiction as to Springpoint, Hudson, and certain employees of Hudson who had been sued in their indiv

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale