In re P.P. CA3
Michael P. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) He contends: (1) the court abused its discretion by denying his petition to modify an existing order (§ 388) without an evidentiary hearing; and (2) the court’s finding that the children are adoptable is not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm.
Comments on In re P.P. CA3