legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.R. CA4/2
C.A. (mother) appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights over her son, J.R. She argues the court erred by determining the parental benefit exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) did not apply. We affirm.
A. Detention, Jurisdiction, and Disposition
In August 2015, the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) filed a dependency petition for newborn J.R., alleging he was at substantial risk of harm within the meaning of section 300, subdivision (b). The petition alleged J.R. had tested positive for opiates and methamphetamine at birth and was being treated for withdrawal. The petition also alleged mother and father suffered from unresolved substance abuse and mental health issues.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale