P. v. Fantroy CA2/4
Lonnie Fantroy appeals from a judgment following his conviction for second degree robbery. He contends his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object to an allegedly impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedure. He further contends the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his request under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero) to strike one of his prior “strike” convictions. Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Fantroy CA2/4