KAATZ v. CITY OF SEASIDE Part II
Proceedings, by which city purchased former military property from the United States pursuant to base closure statute and then sold it to a developer, were not subject to validation statutes. So, taxpayer's action alleging that city illegally conveyed property for a fraction of its fair market value was not subject to shortened statute of limitations. Statute requiring that an appeal, from a "judgment entered pursuant to" the validation statutes, be filed within 30 days of entry of judgment did not apply to taxpayer's appeal from order erroneously dismissing his action as time-barred.
Comments on KAATZ v. CITY OF SEASIDE Part II