legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Tucker CA4/1
Roger Tucker appeals a judgment following his jury conviction on one count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1) ). The trial court also found true allegations that Tucker had a prior serious felony conviction (§§ 667, subd. (a)(1), 668, 1192.7, subd. (c)) and a prior serious or violent felony conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, 668). On appeal, Tucker contends the trial court violated his constitutional right to due process of law by increasing his sentence based on those prior conviction allegations. He also contends the court issued an unauthorized sentence by staying, rather than striking, the punishment for the jury's true finding on the section 12022.7, subdivision (a) allegation for personally inflicting great bodily injury in committing the instant offense.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale