legal news


Register | Forgot Password

County of Orange v. Chen
The County of Orange (the County) obtained a judgment against Kang Shen Chen (Chen) and Chen’s wife in 2007. In 2015, Chen filed a motion to vacate or set aside the judgment on the ground it was procured through extrinsic fraud and/or extrinsic mistake. Chen contends that because the County did not list a lawsuit against him and his wife in the adjustment plan the County filed in its bankruptcy proceedings in 1996, Chen and his wife had a defense of res judicata or estoppel against the County’s lawsuit. We conclude, as did the trial court, that Chen’s lack of knowledge of the contents of a publicly-available document filed in a federal court does not amount to extrinsic fraud or extrinsic mistake. We therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale