legal news


Register | Forgot Password

KAATZ v. CITY OF SEASIDE Part III
Proceedings, by which city purchased former military property from the United States pursuant to base closure statute and then sold it to a developer, were not subject to validation statutes. So, taxpayer's action alleging that city illegally conveyed property for a fraction of its fair market value was not subject to shortened statute of limitations. Statute requiring that an appeal, from a "judgment entered pursuant to" the validation statutes, be filed within 30 days of entry of judgment did not apply to taxpayer's appeal from order erroneously dismissing his action as time-barred.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale