Personal Court Reporters v. Rand-Lewis
Defendant Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Personal Court Reporters, Inc. (PCR). Rand-Lewis contends the judgment is not supported by the evidence, and the contract on which the judgment was based violated the statute of frauds. The record on appeal is insufficient to review these claims, and there is no error apparent on its face. Rand-Lewis also challenges two pretrial orders—one denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings and another vacating a previous judgment. She concedes the latter order is not properly before us, and we find no reversible error in the former. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Personal Court Reporters v. Rand-Lewis