legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Alexis P
In 2002, the juvenile court sustained a dependency petition under section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code on behalf of Alexis, then four years of age. She was detained from her parents and placed with a family member, Ms. M. Several years later, in June 2007, the court appointed Ms. M. as Alexis’s legal guardian under the Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) program, and dismissed the dependency action. Notwithstanding the termination of its dependency jurisdiction, the juvenile court retained general jurisdiction over Alexis as a ward of the guardianship. (In re Priscilla D., supra, 234 Cal.App.4th at p. 1216.)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale