legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.S
D.S. (Father) appeals the juvenile court's judgment declaring his two minor daughters, I.S. and A.S. (the children), to be dependents under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b). Father initially contends there is no substantial evidence to support the court's jurisdictional findings as to his own behavior. Father, joined by O.S. (Mother), appeals the dispositional judgment on the grounds that (a) no substantial evidence was presented that removing the children from parental custody was necessary to protect them from substantial danger, and (b) the court failed to identify or consider reasonable alternatives to such removal. (§ 361, subds. (c)(1)(A)-(B), (d).) Further, Father contends the court abused its discretion in affording him only supervised visits with the children, while giving the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) authority to determine whether unsupervised or extended visitation would be appropriate. (§ 362.1

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale