P. v. Connelly CA1/4
Defendant Jason Connelly appeals after the trial court found him in violation of his probation and imposed new conditions of probation. He contends certain conditions of his probation are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and that substantial evidence does not support the trial court’s finding that he violated probation. We agree that the condition prohibiting defendant from possessing pornography was unconstitutionally vague, that the finding that he violated his probation must therefore be reversed, and that the new conditions must be stricken.
Comments on P. v. Connelly CA1/4