In re Dominik G. CA5
Appellant Dominik G., a minor, appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order following a true finding on the charge appellant committed vandalism. (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a).) Appellant initially argued a probation term regarding electronic searches was overly broad and that the trial court erred in failing to reduce appellant’s conviction to a misdemeanor. Following our request for supplemental briefing, appellant additionally argues the charge brought was a misdemeanor and therefore his felony conviction cannot stand. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on In re Dominik G. CA5