In re M.R. CA2/3
Mother Angel W. appeals from the jurisdiction and disposition orders of the juvenile court declaring her toddler M. a dependent (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subds. (b) & (j)) and removing him from her custody (§ 361, subd. (c)). She contends that the evidence does not support the finding that M. was at risk of substantial harm from her marijuana use or her physical abuse of M.’s sibling, E. She also contends that the court abused its discretion in including drug-testing as part of the disposition order, and that the removal order is not supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that the evidence supports the finding that M. is described by section 300, subdivision (j), and that the removal and drug-testing orders were a proper exercise of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the orders.
Comments on In re M.R. CA2/3