In re R.L. CA2/3
Mother Nakia B. appeals from the dependency court’s orders denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, terminating her parental rights under section 366.26, and selecting adoption as the permanent plan for her five year old son, R.L., and three year old daughter, A.G. Mother’s sole argument on appeal is that the court abused its discretion when it denied her section 388 petition after finding that her nascent drug and alcohol recovery efforts did not constitute changed circumstances sufficient to recommend reinstatement of reunification services. Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on In re R.L. CA2/3