SLOVENSKY v. FRIEDMAN Part I
Where plaintiff consulted attorneys to represent plaintiff in toxic mold personal injury action after statute of limitations on plaintiff's claim had run, but attorneys were able to procure a settlement for plaintiff, trial court properly granted summary judgment to attorneys in plaintiff's subsequent suit against attorneys for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff could not prove damages since plaintiff obtained a recovery plaintiff was not legally entitled to.
Comments on SLOVENSKY v. FRIEDMAN Part I