P. v. Roman
A jury convicted defendant Esteban Delacruz Roman of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on formal probation.
We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed a brief summarizing the proceedings and facts of the case and advised the court he found no arguable issues to assert on defendant’s behalf. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) To assist us in our independent review, counsel suggested we consider whether the court erred by admitting a photograph of methamphetamine and guns found on defendant’s cell phone at the time of his arrest.
Counsel and this court both notified defendant that he could file a supplemental brief on his own behalf. However, we received no supplemental brief from him and the time to file one has passed.
Comments on P. v. Roman