legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.H. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant A.H. (Father) is the father of two boys (the Children), who were ages six and almost eight on the date of the challenged orders. Father appeals from the juvenile court’s orders on December 2, 2016, dismissing the dependency and selecting guardianship with a maternal aunt as the Children’s permanent plan. Father contends the court erred when it found the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) gave adequate notice to the Indian tribes he identified under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq.). Specifically, Father argues CFS failed to adequately inquire about his Native American ancestry so it could include that information on the ICWA notices to the tribes. For the reasons discussed post, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale