In re K.J. CA4/2
Defendants and appellants L.L. (mother) and R.J. (father) appeal the termination of parental rights to their three children at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. They contend the juvenile court’s order must be reversed, because plaintiff and respondent San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services (CFS) and the juvenile court violated relative preferences by approving a permanent plan before a maternal great-aunt’s evaluation was complete. They further claim the court should have found applicable the beneficial parental relationship exception to termination of parental rights. Rejecting their contentions, we affirm.
Comments on In re K.J. CA4/2