legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Newman Real Estate Investments v. Oken CA2/4
It is ordered that the unpublished opinion filed July 11, 2017 be modified as follows:
Footnote 10 is added after the first full paragraph on page 20 with the following text:
“10 In its petition for rehearing, appellant argues that respondents, as the parties moving for summary judgment, had the initial burden of specifically denying that they signed the July 12, 2011 agreement. That is incorrect. “[A] summary judgment motion necessarily is addressed to the pleadings. [Citation.] ‘The purpose of a summary judgment proceeding is to permit a party to show that material factual claims arising from the pleadings need not be tried because they are not in dispute.’ [Citation.] . . .

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale