P. v. Glines CA4/3
Michael Clair Glines appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of numerous sexual offenses against multiple child victims, including his own daughter. Glines argues his lengthy sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment, the trial court erred by failing to consider probation for crimes committed before 2006, and the court improperly imposed separate sentences. None of his contentions have merit, and we affirm the judgment
Comments on P. v. Glines CA4/3