P. v. Lee CA1/4
Defendant Jammie D. Lee appeals from an order reinstating his probation after a contested revocation hearing. Defendant contends he was denied due process because he was not given adequate written notice of the alleged probation violation and no substantial evidence supported the trial court’s findings. He also argues the trial court failed to give him appropriate credit for domestic violence counseling classes. We find no merit in defendant’s claims and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Lee CA1/4