legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Anthony Q. CA2/7
Jonathan Q., the presumed father of 11-year-old Anthony Q., appeals from the juvenile court’s October 21, 2016 order pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 terminating his parental rights and identifying adoption as the permanent plan for Anthony. Jonathan contends the juvenile court committed prejudicial error when it failed to transport him to court from the Los Angeles County Jail for the section 366.26 hearing as required by Penal Code section 2625, subdivision (d), and the court and the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) failed to satisfy their affirmative duty of inquiry imposed by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We agree there was not an adequate investigation of the possible Indian ancestry of Anthony’s mother, Christina R., remand the matter to allow the Department and the juvenile court to remedy that violation of federal and state law and otherwise conditionally affirm the orde

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale