Kyle v. Gentner CA4/3
The parties to this appeal – appellants Rocky Gentner and James Parkhurst, and respondents Brian Kyle, Bobbie Griffith, and Cindy Atkinson – have been before us on a previous appeal, from an order granting respondents’ anti-SLAPP motion. We affirmed the order, which eliminated all but one cause of action – for declaratory relief – in appellants’ cross-complaint.
Respondents’ complaint and what remained of appellants’ cross-complaint were tried to the court in February 2015. The result was a victory for respondents Kyle, Griffith, and Atkinson. Gentner and Parkhurst have appealed, identifying four issues for review. These are (1) the nature of Atkinson’s interest in the limited liability company Bay Cities Partners, LLC; (2) whether a vote to sell Bay Cities’ real property required a majority of the members or a majority of membership interests; (3) whether the court properly entered an injunction against Gentner; and (4) the percentage interest of each Ba
Comments on Kyle v. Gentner CA4/3