legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.L. CA2/6
Jennifer F. (mother) appeals from a judgment declaring her two children, J.L. and A.L., dependents of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section
300. Mother contends that the jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
J.L. was born in 2008. In June 2016 A.L. (infant) was born prematurely “at only 32 weeks of gestation.” Before infant’s birth, mother was diagnosed as being RH negative. The juvenile court found that, because mother had “failed to obtain adequate and standard prenatal care,” infant developed “Hydrops Fetalis, which includes symptoms of anemia.” Mother missed three “of the last prenatal appointments.” Mother said she had missed two appointments because she was visiting family in Arizona. She missed the third appointment “because she did not feel well.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale