P. v. Acosta
A jury convicted appellant of robbing and assaulting victims. It also found appellant used a knife when robbing. Appellant challenges (1) his convictions for robbery and assault; (2) the trial court's failure to stay the weapons enhancement appended to the robbery conviction; and (3) the order for payment of restitution to victim. Appellant also contends, and the People agree, that the trial court erroneously imposed a term of imprisonment for an enhancement that was found not true. Court agreeed with this last contention and vacated the improper sentence on the enhancement. Court affirmd the remainder of the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Acosta