P. v. Valenti CA2/3
Defendant Renoir Vincent Valenti appeals from the judgment entered after he was resentenced for various forms of child sex abuse in accordance with our remand order in his first appeal. After appellate counsel filed a brief in which he raised no issues and asked us to review the record independently under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, defendant submitted a supplemental brief raising defects in his original conviction and appeal and asserting facts that have never been before this court. We have reviewed the entire record and defendant’s supplemental brief and have found no arguable appellate issues. As our review of the record revealed several errors in the amended abstracts of judgment, however, we affirm with directions to correct them.
Comments on P. v. Valenti CA2/3