In re E.F. CA5
Luis M. appeals from juvenile court orders denying his request to be designated the presumed father of his biological son, E.F., and denying him reunification services pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.2, subdivision (a). He challenges only the denial of services. He contends the juvenile court was precluded from offering him services because it found another man to be E.’s presumed father. On that basis, he argues the juvenile court erred in so finding and contends it was in E.’s best interest to offer him services. Finding no merit to Luis’s contentions, we affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re E.F. CA5