Kim v. Kim CA2/4
In the underlying action, appellant Daniel Kim sought the partition of a condominium that he and his mother, respondent Al Soo Kim, owned as tenants in common, and requested an accounting of the rent respondent collected as manager of the property. Prior to trial, the parties sold the property. Following a bench trial on appellant’s request for an accounting, the trial court entered a judgment awarding him no share of the rent. Appellant challenges the judgment, contending that there is insufficient evidence to support the court’s findings, and that the court misapplied the statute of frauds. We reject those contentions and affirm.
Comments on Kim v. Kim CA2/4