P. v. Armenta CA5
Defendant Selena Monique Armenta contends on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to designate her felony convictions for second degree commercial burglary (Pen. Code, § 459, § 460, subd. (b)) as misdemeanors pursuant to Proposition 47 (§ 1170.18). Since defendant filed her appeal, this issue has been resolved in her favor by People v. Gonzales (2017) 2 Cal.5th 858 (Gonzales), as the parties agree by way of supplemental briefing. We reverse and remand.
Comments on P. v. Armenta CA5