legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cheney
Defendant pled no contest to passing multiple worthless checks, and admitted having served a prior prison term. Released on his own recognizance after the bad check plea, defendant failed to show up for sentencing. Defendant was charged with one count of failure to appear, to which he subsequently entered a no contest plea in exchange for the dismissal of an enhancement for committing an offense while released on one's own recognizance. At sentencing for both cases, the trial court imposed the upper term of three years on the bad check conviction and imposed certain fines and fees. On appeal, defendant contends the court erred in imposing each of these three components of his sentence. Only the final contention has merit. Court strikes the theft fine imposed and otherwise affirms the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale