P. v. Warren CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Marvin Warren asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on this appeal from the denial of his petition for resentencing pursuant to Proposition 57. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.
On November 22, 2013, defendant was subjected to a traffic stop while driving a 1995 Nissan Sentra that was reported stolen. Defendant identified himself as his brother and claimed he had purchased the car without knowing it was stolen.
Comments on P. v. Warren CA3