In re A.H. CA1/4
We are familiar with this dependency proceeding, having issued a prior opinion in the matter. (In re Mathias H. (Nov. 16, 2016, A145624 & A146233) [nonpub. op.].) Beatrice L. (mother) now appeals from the order terminating her parental rights with respect to the three children at issue—A.H. (born October 2010), I.R.L. (born May 2013), and Mathias H. (born September 2014)—and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) We appointed counsel to represent mother on appeal.
On June 6, 2017, counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, finding no arguable issues. By accompanying declaration, counsel reported that she had advised mother of the pendency of these proceedings, that a “No Issues Statement” would be filed, and that mother might be permitted to file a letter with this court suggesting any errors she believes were made in the proceedings below. No response has been received from mother.
Comments on In re A.H. CA1/4